Case summary:
This case illustrates the importance of recognizing myocardial blood flow (MBF) and myocardial flow reserve (MFR) values that may reflect vasodilator non-responsiveness and highlights the potential role of repeat stress imaging with dobutamine to exclude coronary artery disease.
Resource Type
Cases
Clinical Topic
Cardiac PET, Ischemic Heart Disease
Related Resources
Cases
PET Case: F-18 Flurpiridaz PET MPI in Cardio-Oncology
F-18 Flurpiridaz PET MPI in Cardio-Oncology: Guiding Therapy Decisions in a Patient…
Cases
PET Case: Visual Perfusion vs Absolute Blood Flow: Differences in Imaging Agents
Case Summary This case illustrates how the differences in tracer extraction fraction…
Cases
PET Case: The Mystery of Chest Pain with Patent Grafts
Case summary: This case illustrates the added value of myocardial blood flow…