Survey: Cardiologists Performing Fewer Advanced Tests on Patients As Tighter Rules, Financial Factors Take Hold
"Put simply, physicians are seeing more patients and performing fewer studies on those patients," report notes.
BALTIMORE, MD -- September 4, 2012 -- A new survey reveals that cardiologists around the United States are seeing more patients than ever before, yet performing, on average, fewer advanced nuclear tests on those patients. The survey cites a change in the approach to the delivery of cardiovascular care, as well as continued concerns about economic conditions, as reasons for the decline.
Despite the decline, the findings confirm cardiologists' are providing Americans with technology-based healthcare that is capable of delivering better diagnostic capabilities, an issue of increasing importance given the increasing number of older citizens requiring cardiac care.
MedAxiom, the leading national source of quantifiable information about the state of cardiology practice, jointly conducted the survey with the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology (ASNC). More than 110 practices, representing more than 2,000 cardiologists, took part in the survey, which was released at ASNC's annual conference, being held this week in Baltimore, MD.
The survey reveals that in 2011, on average, cardiologists recorded more than 2,100 patient visits, up more than 29 percent since 2004. At the same time, however, they performed an average of 356 imaged stress studies last year, such as stress echo tests, single-photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT) tests, or positron emission tomography (PET) tests to detect potential coronary problems such as blocked arteries or reduced pumping efficiency. That number remained, on average, largely flat over the same eight-year period, up only two percent.
Expressed as a ratio, however, the survey revealed that these tests were performed on one of every eleven cardiology patients last year, as opposed to one of every seven in 2008. "Put simply," the survey authors note, "physicians are seeing more patients and performing fewer studies on those patient." The study cited several reasons, such as:
- Increasing adoption of Appropriate Use Criteria;
- Higher deductibles and copays for those with insurance;
- Increased awareness of radiation optimization;
- The use of Provider-Based billing by integrated cardiology practices; and
- An intermittent shortage of Molybdenum-99, a key radioactive isotope in conducting the tests.
"Nuclear cardiology imaging plays, and will continue to play, an important role diagnosing and treating heart disease," said John Mahmarian, MD, president of ASNC. "Our doctors have been vigilant in prescribing the appropriate use of these tests as defined by our participation in the Choosing Wisely initiative. As healthcare evolves in the United States, we intend to continue clearly defining the patient-centered approach to cardiovascular imaging and optimizing the value received from it. Our goal is to continue to provide both quality and value to our patients."